An SEO and GEO audit that connects visibility to sales
The report separates commercial pages from technical noise, tests measurement limits, protects working systems and gives the team an implementation order.
- Evidence status
- Anonymized client audit
- Source
- Client sources, public version
- Period
- Recent 28 day window, exact dates withheld
This public version is based on a completed client audit. Brand, URLs and sensitive values were removed. Exact ratios are not published when their components are withheld.
Control snapshot
- 4 URL sources sitemap, CMS, Search Console, render
- 30+ sampled pages commercial and template pages
- 28 days measurement window exact dates withheld
- 4 AI crawlers access checked separately
The 90 second view
- Fix Segment commercial pages, weak groups and utility URLs instead of sending one bulk indexation task.
- Verify Reconcile the purchase path across the site, tags and analytics. A missing intermediate event does not prove checkout is broken.
- Protect Keep working purchase collection and AI crawler access until a parallel check supports a change.
What was checked and where confidence ends
Sources
- Search Console and sales analytics
- CMS, sitemap and URL inventory
- Merchant and product markup
- Rendered pages, robots and AI crawlers
Coverage
All main URL sources, more than 30 representative pages across key templates, and the path to a recorded purchase were checked.
Limitations
Margin and a CRM order ledger were outside the public evidence pack, so profit and attribution conclusions remain directional.
Measurement confidence
Working with limitations
Purchase and revenue reach analytics. Before changes, the team must rule out duplicate tags, test consent and reconcile transactions with the backend.
Full audit map
The three decisions above give an executive summary. The complete review register below shows the checks behind those decisions.
This page shows 18 of 18 checks in the demonstration register. A client report also links each check to its source, accountable role, and working artifact.
| Check | Priority | Decision | What we established | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 Inventory and indexationCommercial demand is separated from template noise because different URL groups need different decisions. | ||||
| SG-01 | P1 | Fix | Assign each URL to keep, improve, merge, or exclude. | The sitemap, CMS, and Search Console inventories differ and need reconciliation before bulk action. |
| SG-02 | P1 | Protect | Retain commercial pages with confirmed demand. | They render, index, and carry either search or sales evidence. |
| SG-03 | P2 | Verify | Separate service and parameter URLs from weak categories. | Similar visibility does not mean the same cause or the same remedy. |
| 02 Technical rendering and crawl controlWe checked the HTML response and separately inspected what users and crawlers see after rendering. | ||||
| SG-04 | P1 | Fix | Align canonical, indexability, and sitemap rules by group. | The remedy belongs at template level, not on a random individual URL. |
| SG-05 | P2 | Verify | Repeat mobile rendering checks on the main templates. | Pages are available, but JavaScript content completeness needs its own check. |
| SG-06 | P3 | Monitor | Do not change robots rules in the template release. | A combined release would obscure the cause of any crawl change. |
| 03 Commercial pages and MerchantVisibility is compared with stock, structured data, and each page's role in a sale. | ||||
| SG-07 | P1 | Fix | Reconcile product markup, feed data, and the page. | A price, stock, or identifier mismatch leaves the SEO conclusion incomplete. |
| SG-08 | P2 | Develop | Improve collections with demand but a weak answer. | Priority goes to pages where demand is proven and the content does not help selection. |
| SG-09 | P2 | Merge | Consolidate pages without an independent role. | A merge follows query, link, and product coverage checks. |
| 04 Sales and measurement qualityPurchase tracking works, while intermediate events and system reconciliation have limits. | ||||
| SG-10 | P0 | Protect | Preserve the working purchase event. | A purchase with transaction ID and value arrives; changes first pass a diagnostic order. |
| SG-11 | P1 | Verify | Run checkout from cart to purchase without a duplicate. | Missing delivery and payment steps may reflect the integration rather than a broken checkout. |
| SG-12 | P1 | Reconcile | Compare analytics transactions with the internal ledger. | Without a CRM ledger, analytics revenue is not financial truth. |
| 05 GEO, citability, and AI accessCrawler access and citability are separate conditions, and neither guarantees an outcome. | ||||
| SG-13 | P2 | Protect | Keep access open for the main AI crawlers. | HTTP and robots checks show no explicit blocker for the tested bots. |
| SG-14 | P2 | Develop | Add concise answers with dates, sources, and limits. | A verifiable fact with a method is stronger than a general marketing claim. |
| SG-15 | P3 | Measure | Report AI referrals separately from forecasts. | Existing visits do not prove returns, and some sources cannot be identified. |
| 06 Evidence, links, and editorial ownershipAuthority is assessed through claim provenance and maintenance, not a synthetic score. | ||||
| SG-16 | P2 | Strengthen | Tie commercial claims to primary evidence. | The page should show where a fact came from and when it was last checked. |
| SG-17 | P2 | Assign | Give commercial pages an accountable role and review cycle. | Correct content becomes stale when nobody owns the next review. |
| SG-18 | P3 | Monitor | Track citations beside search and sales signals. | GEO is useful as a separate view but does not replace business outcomes. |
Priority decisions with evidence
The catalog needs group decisions, not bulk reindexing
- Observation
- Commercial pages, weak listings and utility variants share one problem group. A browser sample rendered, so crawl rate limiting was not misreported as a broken site.
- Decision logic
- Bulk submission does not remove root causes. Pages with real demand are counter evidence and must be protected.
- Action and verification
- The SEO lead assigns keep, improve, merge or exclude to every group. Acceptance: at days 14 and 28, each group retains at least its baseline share of valid URLs; deterioration returns the group to diagnosis.
Checkout detail is incomplete, but sales are not broken
- Observation
- Purchases arrive while delivery and payment steps are not separated. This may be a native integration limit.
- Decision logic
- Rebuilding tracking could duplicate purchase. Backend and analytics show similar transaction volume.
- Action and verification
- Analyst runs a debug checkout. Acceptance: one purchase with transaction ID and value, no duplicate, and an explained backend variance.
AI traffic is measurable, but too small for a forecast
- Observation
- AI sources produced visits and at least one commercial outcome, and major crawlers could access public pages.
- Decision logic
- The channel exists, but low volume and unattributed AI visits do not prove sustainable returns.
- Action and verification
- The content editor and analyst maintain a separate AI referral report. Acceptance: sessions, outcomes, landing pages and source are reviewed monthly without a composite GEO score.
What works and should not change
Preserve purchase collection and crawler access
Key pages render, purchases arrive and major AI crawlers are not blocked.
Do not change tags and robots in one release. Verify in parallel first.
Target state and change rules
Target state
One URL inventory, stable purchase tracking, evidence-backed pages, and a separate AI referral report.
How we test
Changes ship in URL groups and are read after 14 and 28 days against an unchanged control.
When we roll back
A group returns to diagnosis if validity, purchases, or commercial visibility falls below baseline.
The 7, 30 and 90 day plan
-
7 daysSegment URLs and debug checkout.
- Owner
- SEO lead and analyst
- Acceptance criteria
- Every URL group has a keep, improve, merge or exclude decision, and one purchase path is proven without duplicate events.
-
30 daysFix verified template and Merchant issues.
- Owner
- Frontend engineer, content editor and ecommerce manager
- Acceptance criteria
- Every URL in the control sample passes the repeated technical check after publication.
-
90 daysExpand pages with demand and measure AI separately.
- Owner
- SEO/GEO lead
- Acceptance criteria
- Demand, sales and monthly deltas drive priority.
What the client receives
- Owner decision brief
- Source and limitation map
- Evidence backed finding register
- 7/30/90 tasks with acceptance criteria
- URL, Merchant and measurement appendix
Method and appendices
- URL inventory and keep / improve / merge / exclude rules
- Canonical, indexability, sitemap, and template map
- Ecommerce event and transaction reconciliation
- AI crawler matrix and GEO observation log
Need the same link between SEO, GEO and commercial data?
We define sources and evidence mode first, then deliver decisions your owners can verify.
Discuss an audit for your business